VicGrid’s draft 2025 Transmission Plan: overview
The Victorian Government has unveiled its draft 2025 Victorian Transmission Plan (draft VTP), outlining a strategic roadmap to transform the state's energy infrastructure over the next 15 years. The Plan aims to facilitate the transition from coal-fired power to renewable energy, supporting the state's overarching target of achieving 65 per cent renewable electricity by 2030 and 95 per cent by 2035.
The Plan follows the earlier release of the proposed Renewable Energy Zones, which were open for consultation in August 2024 (see our article Important developments in Victoria’s energy transition: VicGrid releases draft guidelines and renewable energy zone study area)
We outline the key propositions of the draft VTP, discuss its implications for developers, and provide guidance on how to make a submission and what the relationship is with the planning approval process.
Key takeaways: 2025 Victorian Transmission Plan
Renewable Energy Zones (REZs)
In the 2024 plan, three tiers of geographic areas were considered by VicGrid for potential REZs as outlined in the 2024 Victorian Transmission Plan Guidelines. Following community and industry consultation, the draft VTP now designates seven major REZs across regions such as Gippsland, Central Highlands, and the Wimmera, as shown on this map.
The process carried out to narrow down the areas is said to have considered economic costs, land use, community preferences, regional development opportunities, generator interest, existing levels of development, wind and sun access, cultural heritage information and community and industry feedback.
Of note is the fact that the previously identified Oven Murray REZ has been excluded from the draft plan, while the Central North REZ now excludes the Glenrowan region and Benalla, areas with ongoing, existing solar farm projects. In their place, the draft VTP focuses on other regions, such as Victoria's west, for initial development.
In comparison to the five larger REZs being rolled out in New South Wales, Victoria’s seven proposed REZs are smaller in size. The proposed Victorian REZs aim to provide land for over 8 GW of new capacity, while NSW is planning more than 11 GW of capacity within its REZs.
It is important to understand that the REZs are not equivalent to zones under a Planning Scheme, nor, at the moment, are the REZs referenced in any way in the Planning Policy Framework. All proposed projects (both within and outside REZ areas) will still need to be assessed on a case-by-case basis under the applicable Planning Scheme; however, there is an expectation there will be further reforms to follow of the environmental assessment process to provide more streamlined environmental assessment for projects that are within the final REZ areas.
Transmission infrastructure
There are seven proposed Transmission Projects, including the construction of approximately 380 km of new high-voltage power lines and the upgrading of 430 km of existing lines as follows:
- a second Hazelwood to Yallourn double circuit 220 kV line in Gippsland (~10 km long), planned for 2028;
- the Gippsland offshore wind transmission stage 2 project, adding two new 500 kV lines from Driffield to Woodside and Woodside to Giffard, plus new terminal stations;
- the stage 2 transmission loop will support ~7 GW of offshore wind energy when combined with stage 1, planned between 2033–2038;
- a new 500 kV line in South West Victoria, from Tarrone to Sydenham, following existing transmission easements, needed by 2033; and
- a new 500/220 kV terminal station near Truganina, plus two 220 kV lines linking to Deer Park terminal station.
While the draft plan identifies these projects as being needed, the location where each line will be built has not yet been identified. A more detailed planning process for these projects will be conducted over the next three years.
Gippsland Shoreline Renewable Energy Zone
Unlike REZs, the Gippsland Shoreline Renewable Energy Zone is not designed to host onshore wind or solar projects and generators. Instead, it will provide a limited area where offshore wind developers will need to site and coordinate their connections to the power grid, while minimising impacts on host landholders, communities, nearby towns and landscapes.
Projects within the proposed REZs
For developments inside a proposed REZ, inclusion in the Transmission Plan does not replace statutory planning and environmental approval processes, including approvals and engagement requirements for projects. However, by incorporating community consultation, environmental inclusion and social factors early in the approval process, the VTP is intended to support the efficacy of relevant approval processes.
Specific changes would be required to be made to the Planning Schemes and to the Environmental Effects Act 1978 (or the Ministerial Guidelines under that Act) in order to provide any benefit in a statutory approval sense to being within a REZ. At this stage, there is no proposed planning scheme amendment to facilitate such changes.
Projects outside the proposed REZs
Projects that ultimately fall outside of a final REZ will be subject to a Grid Impact Assessment. As part of this assessment, these projects must meet both government-set standards of community engagement and benefits and demonstrate that their connection will not have a negative impact on projects inside the REZs by limiting their generation or taking up capacity on the grid.
Furthermore, if changes are made to the Planning Schemes or EES process to provide that the REZ must be considered in making planning decisions, then falling outside a REZ could make it more difficult to obtain planning approval for these projects.
What is proposed for community benefits in the REZ areas?
Another aspect of the draft VTP is that it sets out a new approach to coordination of community benefits programs by developers. It includes a draft REZ Community Benefits Plan which features:
- the introduction of new REZ Community Energy Funds to benefit regional and rural communities;
- payments for host landholders;
- guidance for payments for significantly impacted neighbours; and
- a commitment to work with Traditional Owners and First Peoples on a new approach to economic benefits.
It is proposed that the Renewable Energy Zone Community Energy Funds and Traditional Owner benefits will be funded by access fees paid by generation developers who build projects within renewable energy zones, and by mandatory financial contributions from transmission companies.
What happens next?
VicGrid is actively seeking public feedback on the draft VTP, with a particular focus on the seven proposed REZs. Stakeholders can submit feedback during the ongoing public consultation phase on the boundaries of the REZs. The public feedback period closes on 24 June 2025.
For developers with proposed projects that fall outside the proposed REZs, it is important to actively participate in this submission process and to demonstrate the strategic importance of their projects, the relative amenity impacts and advocating for their inclusion in the final plan.
Lessons from the NSW Inquiry into REZs
Finally, in New South Wales, a parliamentary inquiry has been underway since 30 July 2024 to assess the impact of REZs on rural and regional communities. The first hearings for the inquiry began on 13 May 2025, with REZ opponents beginning to voice their frustrations. Although ongoing, the inquiry is highlighting the need for continuing monitoring and engagement to balance the benefits and challenges associated with REZs. Lessons from this process may inform Victoria's approach, potentially leading to adjustments in the designation of REZs.
Conclusion
By prioritising the development of REZs, upgrading critical transmission infrastructure, and introducing tailored solutions such as the Gippsland Shoreline REZ, the draft VTP reflects a forward-thinking approach grounded in public consultation and strategic need.
However, the current uncertainty of the interaction with the planning and environmental approval process means the success of the final VTP will depend on meaningful stakeholder engagement, robust environmental assessment, and a willingness to learn from parallel initiatives, such as the ongoing NSW inquiry.
With the public consultation window open until 24 June 2025, now is a crucial time for developers, communities, and industry participants to have their voices heard and help shape the future of Victoria’s energy system.
This article was prepared with the assistance of Karun Dhaliwal, Law Graduate.
Contact