Thinking | 1 December 2020

Update: keeping it casual? High Court grants leave for appeal of Rossato decision

By Fay Calderone

Employers for many months have been struggling to understand and ensure compliance with a decision of the Full Federal Court in May. The Court found that an employee of labour hire business WorkPac Pty Ltd who was engaged and paid as a casual was in fact ‘other than a casual employee’ for the purposes of certain sections of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). This entitled the employee to annual leave, compassionate leave and personal leave as well as payment for public holidays.

Hall & Wilcox examined the decision and its implications at the time.

Employers across a variety of industries waited to see what would happen next, as multiple class actions were filed on behalf of employees.

This could all be reversed, however, as the High Court has now granted WorkPac special leave to appeal the decision.

The application for leave to appeal was supported by the Federal Government due to concerns about the significant cost and burden of the decision on businesses. Employer industry advocates such as Australian Industry Group (Ai Group) have also welcomed the High Court accepting the appeal. Ai Group estimated the cost to businesses could be up to $39 billion.

The appeal is expected to be heard next year.

This grant of leave will be one of the final decisions of Justices Virginia Bell and Geoffrey Nettle, as both are retiring from the High Court this year.

Hall & Wilcox will monitor the appeal as it progress and provide regular updates.


This article was written with the assistance of Andrew Banks, Law Graduate.

Contact

You might be also interested in...

Employment & Workplace Relations | 22 May 2020

Rossato decision confirms Skene: casuals may not truly be casuals at all

On 20 May 2020, the Full Federal Court handed down its long-awaited decision in WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato [2020] FCAFC 84. The Court found that an employee of labour hire business WorkPac Pty Ltd (WorkPac) engaged and paid as a casual was in fact ‘other than a casual employee’ for the purposes of sections 86, 95 and 106 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act).

Employment & Workplace Relations | 24 Jun 2020

Don’t leave me out: WA casual entitled to long service leave

The recent Full Court of the Federal Court decision in Workpac v Rossato has generated considerable discussion around casual employment. While employers are still grappling with the implications of the Rossato decision, hot on its heels is a decision of the Western Australian Industrial Magistrates Court which looks at the circumstances where a casual employee will be entitled to long service leave in WA.