Employers: your return to work obligations don’t end after 52 weeks
Butterworth v Independence Australia Services (Human Rights)  VCAT 2056 (22 December 2015).
Do you think your return-to-work obligations finish after the 52 week employment obligation period set out in the Workplace Injury Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2013 (Vic) (WIRC Act) ends?
A recent decision of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal) has highlighted that after the 52-week period in the WIRC Act has lapsed, section 20 of the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic) (EO Act) applies. Section 20 of the EO Act requires an employer to make reasonable adjustments for any person with an impairment who requires those adjustments in order to perform the genuine and reasonable requirements of the employment.
If the employee still cannot adequately perform the genuine and reasonable requirements of the employment even after those adjustments are made, then employment may be terminated.
What reasonable adjustments are employers required to make?
The employee’s duties must be adjusted in such a way that allows the employee to adequately perform the genuine and reasonable requirements of their employment.
The recent Tribunal decision makes it clear that defining the genuine and reasonable requirements of the employment is not a straight-forward task. It requires consideration of the employment as a whole, and especially the employee’s contract of employment (including their position description), as well as the organisational and operational requirements of the employment. Importantly, this requires a broader consideration by the employer than whether the employee can perform the inherent requirements of their pre-injury role.
For example, it may be reasonable for the employer to redeploy the employee to another part of the business, even if this requires moving other staff around.
You can read more about reasonable adjustments in our previous article here.
Follow Hall & Wilcox on LinkedIn.
You might be also interested in...
Employment & Workplace Relations | 18 Mar 2016
In a recent decision of the Federal Circuit Court1, an employer was found to have taken unlawful adverse action against a female director on parental leave.
Employment & Workplace Relations | 29 Mar 2016
In a recent decision of the Fair Work Commission,1 an employer was ordered to reinstate an employee who had been dismissed for safety breaches. In making the order, the Commission gave weight to the employer’s past treatment of other employees who had committed safety breaches.