Corporate Tax Avoidance – Interim Senate Committee Report – ‘Part 1: You cannot tax what you cannot see
Yesterday, the Senate Economics References Committee released an interim report on the Senate Inquiry into corporate tax avoidance and aggressive minimisation.
The Interim Report outlines a range of recommendations regarding:
- efforts to combat tax avoidance and minimisation;
- evidence of tax avoidance and minimisation;
- areas where to take action to protect Australia’s revenue levels; and
- the ability for government agencies to collect corporate taxes.
The main recommendations include:
- Implementation of a mandatory tax reporting code as soon as possible. This would require Australian corporations and subsidiaries of multinational corporations, with annual turnover over a specific figure, to publicly report financial information;
- Establishment of a public register of tax avoidance settlements reached with the ATO;
- ATO and other agencies, should release an annual public report on tax avoidance and aggressive tax minimisation;
- Companies tendering for government business required to reveal their country of domicile for tax purposes;
- Mandatory notification by agencies to a Government Minister about contracts above a specified figure that are given to companies who are domiciled overseas for tax reasons;
- ATO to be independently audited;
- ATO to report annually to parliament on audits and tax disputes with multinational corporations;
- Modification to taxation legislation to ensure non-reporting entities are required to disclose related party information in financial reports;
- Modification to the ASIC Act to allow information sharing with the ATO without notifying the affected individual; and
- Australian Government to work with Governments of other countries to increase the transparency of information about taxation and inter-related party dealings.
The Interim Report underscores a growing push for greater transparency into the affairs of large multinational taxpayers, and echoes recent developments in other advanced economies in targeting multinational tax avoidance.
Contact
Jordon Lee
Lawyer
Geoff Benson
Lawyer
Harvey Duckett
Lawyer
Luke Denham
Lawyer
Jemima Whiteman
Lawyer
Bradley White
Lawyer
Sarah Khan
Lawyer
Marie Mitilineos
Lawyer
Gloria Tam
Lawyer
Sheldon Fu
Lawyer
Anna Cao
Lawyer
Claire Bourke
Lawyer
Chloe Taylor
Lawyer
Silvana Brcina
Lawyer
Daphne Schilizzi
Lawyer
Andrew Banks
Lawyer
Isabella Urso
Lawyer
Jessica Liu
Lawyer
Amelia Spratt
Lawyer
Luke Raams
Lawyer
Emma McDonald
Lawyer
Carl Ayers
Lawyer
Gus Hu
Lawyer
Rebecca Dodd
Lawyer
Gretel Burns
Lawyer
Rachel Bonic
Lawyer
Samantha Frost
Lawyer
Emma Bechaz
Lawyer
Related practices
You might be also interested in...
Tax | 20 Aug 2015
Talking Tax – Issue 1
Taxpayer bears onus of proving taxable income in Court – 11 August 2015
Insolvency & Restructuring | 12 Aug 2015
ATO v Liquidators – The tables are turned
The Federal Court’s decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Warner [2015] FCA 659 has clarified that the Australian Taxation Office’s (ATO) coercive powers requiring a taxpayer to produce documents and information to the ATO prevail over section 486 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (CA) (section 486 provides that a Court order must first be obtained before a creditor is authorised to inspect the books of a company).