How will the new Aged Care Bill affect aged care approved providers?

Insights22 Oct 2024

Historic aged care reforms to enhance the quality of aged care in Australia and to cater for the country’s ageing population[1] are proposed under the Federal Government’s new Aged Care Bill 2024, recently introduced into Parliament and is due to commence on 1 July 2025. 

The reforms respond to the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety and the Final Report of the Aged Care Taskforce. We outline the Bill’s key changes for aged care providers, particularly how they will affect compliance, duties and obligations. 

Snapshot – Aged Care Bill
Snapshot – What is to come?
Snapshot – Some differences from consultation and exposure drafts
Snapshot – Key changes for aged care providers
Snapshot – Residential Care
Snapshot – Support at Home
New regulatory powers for the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission

Part 3 of Chapter 5 of the Aged Care Bill introduces new regulatory powers for the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (ACQSC).[2] This includes the right to require enforceable undertakings and seek injunctive relief.

As the national regulator of funded aged care services, the ACQSC will play a greater role in protecting and enhancing the safety and wellbeing of people who access aged care services.[3] 

Independent Statutory Complaints Commissioner

Of note, there will be a new Independent Statutory Complaints Commissioner (Complaints Commissioner), who has powers and responsibilities independent of the Regulatory Commissioner and the ACQSC. 

Under sections 357 and 358 of the Aged Care Bill, the Complaints Commissioner will address all complaints and feedback they directly receive, as well as make complaints when registered providers or responsible persons do not comply with the law.[4] This positions the Complaints Commissioner as a stand-alone statutory body, with its own authority and complaints functions. 

The role of the Complaints Commissioner also extends to regulate the broader healthcare industry by identifying trends and systemic issues, promoting a culture of open disclosure and communicating feedback and complaints to the System Governor and Minister.

Code of Conduct

Under section 145, it is a condition of registration that a registered provider complies with the Aged Care Code of Conduct (Code) and takes reasonable steps to ensure that the aged care workers (and the responsible persons) of the registered provider comply with the Code.[5]

Statutory duty and compensation
Registered provider duty

Section 179 outlines the registered provider’s duty to ensure that their conduct does not cause adverse effects to the health and safety of individuals to whom they are delivering funded care services to. 

Section 179 states:

179       Registered provider duty

(1)        A registered provider must ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the conduct of the provider does not cause adverse effects to the health and safety of individuals to whom the provider is delivering funded aged care services while the provider is delivering those services.

(2)        In this Act, reasonably practicable, in relation to a duty imposed under this Part, means that which is, or was at a particular time, reasonably able to be done, taking into account and weighing up all relevant matters including:

(a)        the likelihood of the adverse effect concerned occurring; and

(b)        the likely degree of harm from the adverse effect; and

(c)        what the person concerned knows, or ought reasonably to know, about ways of preventing the adverse effect; and

(d)        the availability and suitability of ways to prevent the adverse effect; and

(e)        the rights of individuals under the Statement of Rights.

Note:    Under the Statement of Rights, an individual has a right to exercise choice and make decisions that affect the individual’s life, including taking personal risks.

Of note, strict liability criminal offences have been removed from the Aged Care Bill for breach of statutory duties. The previously proposed strict liability offences eliminated the requirement to weigh evidence or make conclusions about whether a registered provider or responsible person was guilty or liable for the breach. 

The removal places a greater burden on regulatory authorities such as the ACQSC and Complaints Commissioner to prove that a Registered Provider has breached their duties.

Duty for certain responsible persons

Under section 180, a responsible person of a registered provider, other than a person responsible for the day-to-day operations of the registered provider, must exercise due diligence to ensure that the provider complies with their duties under section 179.[6]

Section 180 states:

180       Duty for certain responsible persons

(1)        A person who is a responsible person of a registered provider (other than a person referred to in subparagraph 12(1)(c)(ii)) must exercise due diligence to ensure that the provider complies with the provider’s duty under section 179.

(2)        In this section, due diligence includes taking reasonable steps:

(a)        to acquire and maintain knowledge of requirements applying to registered providers under this

Act; and

(b)        to gain an understanding of the nature of the funded aged care services the registered

provider delivers and the potential adverse effects that can result to individuals when delivering those services; and

(c)        to ensure that the registered provider has available for use, and uses, appropriate resources and processes to manage adverse effects to the health and safety of individuals accessing funded aged care services delivered by the provider; and

(d)        to ensure that the registered provider has appropriate processes for receiving and considering information regarding incidents and risks and responding in a timely way to that information; and

(e)        to ensure that the registered provider has, and implements, processes for complying with any duty or requirement of the registered provider under this Act.

 

(3)        A person may be found liable to pay a civil penalty under this Act relating to a duty under this section whether or not the registered provider has been found liable to pay a civil penalty under section 179.

There has also been the elimination of strict liability offences for breaches of the duty for responsible persons. This means that breaches of both the registered provider duty and duty for responsible persons are subject to civil penalties only. Whether or not the registered provider is liable to pay a civil penalty under section 179 will not affect their liability under section 180 of the Act.

The new Statutory duties and civil penalties replace sanctions.

Of note, the general defence of reasonable excuse has also been removed from the Aged Care Bill.[7]

Compensation orders 

The proposed compensation pathway remains under section 186 of the Aged Care Bill, but with variations. The Federal Court or the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) may order an entity to compensate an individual for serious injury or illness if the entity is liable to a civil penalty under sub sections 179(3) and (5) and the serious injury or illness resulted from the contravention. Therefore, for compensation to be ordered, the entity must have breached the registered provider duty. 

The Aged Care Bill 2023 grants the Federal Court and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) powers to order an entity to compensate an individual for serious illness or injury if the entity is found guilty of any offence against any of Part 5, Chapter 3. This means that an entity would have been ordered to compensate an individual for breach of the registered provider duty or the responsible person duty.

Comparatively, the Aged Care Bill restricts the compensation orders that can be sought.

New provider registration system

The new model will introduce universal provider registration – a single registration for each provider across all aged care programs.

If you currently deliver multiple programs (such as home care and residential aged care), you will only need to register once under the new regulatory model. This includes if you are registered in multiple registration categories.

A separate process – called deeming – will apply for current providers when the new Aged Care Act starts.

The standard registration period for providers will be three years. The ACQSC may specify a shorter or longer period, depending on certain factors.

To register in an additional category, you will need to submit a form to the ACQSC to vary your registration.

Registration categories

There will be six registration categories that group service types based on similar care complexity and risk.

Provider registration category
Description
Service types

Category 1

Home and community services

  • Domestic assistance
  • Home maintenance and repairs
  • Meals
  • Transport

Category 2

Assistive technology and home modifications

  • Equipment and products
  • Home adjustments

Category 3

Advisory and support services

  • Hoarding and squalor assistance
  • Social support and community engagement

Category 4

Personal care and care support in the home or community (including respite)

  • Allied health and other therapy
  • Personal care
  • Nutrition
  • Therapeutic services for independent living
  • Home or community general respite
  • Community cottage respite
  • Care management
  • Restorative care management

Category 5

Nursing and transition care

  • Nursing care
  • Assistance with transition care

Category 6

Residential care (including respite)

  • Residential accommodation
  • Residential everyday living
  • Residential services
  • Residential clinical care

Under section 11 of the Aged Care Bill, a registered provider will be required to be registered in one or more of the above categories. At a minimum, this must include registration in the residential care category.[8] The Department will contact providers to confirm their details and ensure that they are registered in the right categories. 

Banning orders

Part 11 of Chapter 6 allows for banning orders to prevent workers and providers who contravene the law from operating in the sector. The Commissioner must provide written notice to an entity alerting them of the reasons why the Commissioner is considering making the banning order and must invite the entity to make written submissions to the Commissioner within 14 days of receiving the notice.[9] A notice of decision will be provided to the entity as soon as is practicable after the Commissioner decides whether to make a banning order.[10]

Under section 497, the Commissioner may make banning orders on current and former registered providers, which prohibit or restrict the delivery of funded aged care services generally or in a specified service type.[11] 

In addition, under section 498, the Commissioner may make banning orders on individuals as aged care workers and responsible persons of registered providers which prohibit or restrict the involvement of the individual in the delivery of the funded aged care services generally, in a specified service type or within a specified activity of a registered provider.[12]

The banning orders provided in the Aged Care Bill are largely consistent with the exposure draft of the Bill.

The Aged Care Bill 2023 established that a banning order cannot prohibit or restrict delivery of funded aged care services in a specified service type if the entity is a registered provider (in a provider registration category) because the entity intended to deliver funded aged care services in that service type. 

However, the Aged Care Bill 2024 introduces section 497(3), which renders this inapplicable if the Commissioner imposes a condition on the registration of the registered provider which results in the registered provider being unable to deliver the funded aged care services in the specified service type. 

Penalty for contravening banning orders

An entity will be subject to a civil penalty of 1000 penalty units if:

  • the entity breaches a banning order or a condition to which the banning order is subject; or 
  • the entity is a registered provider, and a banning order is in place for an individual who is an aged care worker or responsible person of the registered provider, and the entity fails to take reasonable steps to ensure that the individual does not engage in conduct that would breach the banning order or a condition to which the banning order is subject.[13]
Whistleblower protections and providing a disclosure

Under the Aged Care Bill, registered providers remain obliged to ensure that aged care workers and responsible persons who make disclosures are not victimised.

A disclosure of information by an individual is classified as protected under section 547 if it is made on reasonable grounds and communicated to:

  • an appointed commissioner (or other member of staff to the Commission);
  • the system governor (or an official of the Department);
  • a registered provider (or a responsible person of the registered provider);
  • an aged care worker of a registered provider (which is broadly defined and includes a volunteer);
  • a police officer; or
  • an independent aged care advocate.

The disclosure can be made orally or in writing (and whether made anonymously or not).

The discloser must have reasonable grounds to suspect that the information indicates that an entity may have contravened a provision of the Act.

If a disclosure is made under section 547, the individual will not be subject to any liability for making the disclosure and no contractual right or remedy will be enforceable against the individual based on the disclosure.[14] 

Section 549 requires entities, as the recipient of a disclosure, to take reasonable steps to preserve the anonymity of the individual where requested.[15]

Section 549 imposes a further measure on recipients and entities, in addition to sections 550-553, to uphold their obligations of confidentiality when receiving a disclosure from an individual. Entities are subject to 30 civil penalty units if they disclosure the identity of the discloser or any information that is likely to lead to the identification of the discloser.[16]

Importantly, section 551 operates to ensure that aged care workers and responsible persons who make disclosures are not victimised. 

Entities will be subject to 500 penalty units if:

  • they engage in conduct that causes detriment to an individual because they suspect or know that the individual’s disclosure qualifies for protection under section 547; or
  • the entity makes a threat to an individual to inflict fear that the threat will be carried out and this threat is made on the basis that the entity suspects or knows that the individual has or intends to make a disclosure that qualifies for protection under section 547. It is not necessary to prove that the individual actually feared that the threat would be carried out or that the individual made (or had the intention to make) a disclosure. 

This broader threshold provides greater protection to whistleblowers. 

Commentary
Independent Statutory Complaints Commissioner

Although the staff of the Commission will assist the Complaints Commissioner, they will not hold these complaints functions. The introduction of the Complaints Commissioner will promote the independence, transparency and accountability of the complaints handling process.[17] 

Statutory duties and compensation

The removal of strict liability offences for breach of statutory duties imposes a greater threshold on decision-makers when holding entities and responsible persons accountable for safeguarding and protecting older people. While the statements of rights and principles enshrined in the Aged Care Bill promote the right of individuals to an adequate standard of living, it is important that there are sufficient penalties in place and avenues of compensation available to protect those in aged care. Nonetheless, it should be clearly stipulated in the Aged Care Bill that a plaintiff cannot recover damages under both civil liability legislation and the Aged Care Act.

The Aged Care Bill would be strengthened by addressing other considerations such as contributory negligence, proportionate liability and protections for volunteers – it is important to strike the right balance between protectory and punitive measures.

There are additional changes that space did not permit us to cover in this article. We have webinars planned and are currently providing presentations to boards and management of clients. If you want more details please contact Alison Choy Flannigan on the contact details below. 

This article was written with the assistance of Emily Slocombe, Law Graduate.


[1] Once in a generation aged care reforms. 
[2] Chapter 5, Part 3 of the Aged Care Bill 2024.
[3] Section 358 of the Aged Care Bill 2024.
[4] Section 358 of the Aged Care Bill 2024.
[5] Code of Conduct for Aged Care.
[6] Section 180 of the Aged Care Bill 2024.
[7] The Aged Care Bill 2023 (Exposure Draft). 
[8] Section 11(3) of the Aged Care Bill 2024.
[9] Section 499 of the Aged Care Bill 2024.
[10] Section 502 of the Aged Care Bill 2024.
[11] Section 497 of the Aged Care Bill 2024.
[12] Section 498 of the Aged Care Bill 2024.
[13] Section 500 of the Aged Care Bill 2024. 
[14] Section 548 of the Aged Care Bill 2024.
[15] Section 549 of the Aged Care Bill 2024.
[16] Section 550 of the Aged Care Bill 2024.
[17] Regulation and oversight under the new Aged Care Act.

Contact

Hall & Wilcox acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the land, sea and waters on which we work, live and engage. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of service apply.