Proposed significant investor visa changes unworkable: Hall & Wilcox
Legal firm Hall & Wilcox says proposed changes to the Significant Investor Visa (SIV) raised in an Austrade discussion paper will prove unworkable as it misunderstands Chinese investors.
Eugene Chen, a Special Counsel and Head of China practice at Hall & Wilcox, said proposed new requirements, which include investing minimum 50 per cent in venture capital and small caps funds, along with a ban on direct investment in residential property (potentially extending to residential property development), introduce unacceptable risks for Chinese investors.
“We have worked closely with fund managers and financial services firms to attract Chinese investors since the scheme was introduced, so we know what makes them tick.
“We know that Chinese investors want low risk investments, something that they understand.
“The risk appetite is not there.”
Mr Chen said he agrees with the need to increase venture capital (VC) investment in Australia, but warned the changes are unlikely to create a VC ‘honey pot’. “My understanding of Chinese SIV investors is that they may decide to opt-out altogether. It has potential to at least diminish, and possibly kill-off the regime.”
Chinese investors tend to see Australia as a destination for low risk, relatively stable returns, rather than speculation, according to Mr Chen. “If we look at it from the Chinese investor’s point of view, the difference in VC returns between Australia and China is vast.
“In China there are more opportunities for much more lucrative VC returns. But the risk profile is the same. So why take that risk in Australia?
“We cannot assume that the lure of residency will be enough, as these investors have other options.”
Mr Chen said that Hall & Wilcox clients had expressed strong concern at the changes. “We agree that more VC investment is needed. We also agree that land-banking is wrong. But the changes need to be considered further as they may put the scheme at risk.”
Contact
Jordon Lee
Lawyer
Geoff Benson
Lawyer
Harvey Duckett
Lawyer
Luke Denham
Lawyer
Jemima Whiteman
Lawyer
Bradley White
Lawyer
Sarah Khan
Lawyer
Marie Mitilineos
Lawyer
Gloria Tam
Lawyer
Sheldon Fu
Lawyer
Anna Cao
Lawyer
Claire Bourke
Lawyer
Chloe Taylor
Lawyer
Silvana Brcina
Lawyer
Daphne Schilizzi
Lawyer
Andrew Banks
Lawyer
Isabella Urso
Lawyer
Jessica Liu
Lawyer
Amelia Spratt
Lawyer
Luke Raams
Lawyer
Emma McDonald
Lawyer
Carl Ayers
Lawyer
Gus Hu
Lawyer
Rebecca Dodd
Lawyer
Gretel Burns
Lawyer
Rachel Bonic
Lawyer
Samantha Frost
Lawyer
Emma Bechaz
Lawyer
Matt Dolan
Lawyer
Luke Hefferan
Lawyer
You might be also interested in...
Thinking | 19 Feb 2015
The Working Paper Issue 15
Contents More changes ahead? Productivity Commission to scrutinise Australia’s workplace relations framework General protections update: why the decision-maker is critical to defending a claim A dangerous policy: HR policy lands employer in breach of contract For the record…the new challenge of secret recordings in the workplace More changes ahead? Productivity Commission to scrutinise Australia’s […]
Thinking | 3 Feb 2015
Tougher ASIC to challenge financial services product development in 2015: Hall & Wilcox
A tougher ASIC will require financial services firms to think harder about their products and compliance systems during 2015, according to leading independent law firm Hall & Wilcox. Harry New, a Partner at Hall & Wilcox, said the regulator is looking to intervene and make examples where they can. “Financial services firms need to be […]