Media Release | 21 September 2015

Australia introduces multinational tax avoidance laws

Australia is taking a leading role in the growing push for global businesses to pay their fair share of tax.

The Tax Laws Amendment (Combating Multinational Tax Avoidance) Bill 2015 (the Bill) has been released, revealing Australia’s plans to tackle corporate tax avoidance through the imposition of stringent reporting requirements for multinational companies, a multinational anti-avoidance law (MAL) and harsh penalties for entities found to be flouting the rules. The Bill is currently in draft form and at first reading stage. We will be following its progress through Parliament.

The Bill implements recommendations made at the 2014 G20 summit on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Action Plan through a host of amendments to both the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (1936 Act) and Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (1997 Act) as well as the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Administration Act).

The package of measures introduced in this draft of the Bill has been summarised below.

Introduction of ‘Significant Global Entity’

Schedule 1 of the Bill amends the 1997 Act by introducing the concept of a ‘significant global entity’, which is generally defined as a global parent entity with an annual global income of $1 billion or more, or any member of a global parent entity’s group.

If an entity fails to provide the Commissioner with the required global financial statements, the Commissioner can declare that an entity is a significant global entity for the purposes of the 1997 Act if he reasonably believes that, had the statements been prepared, the entity’s annual global income would have been $1 billion or more over the relevant period.

Multinational anti-avoidance law

Schedule 2 of the Bill amends the anti-avoidance provisions in Part IVA of the 1936 Act by introducing a MAL. The MAL will prohibit significant global entities from entering into complex, contrived and artificial schemes to avoid paying tax in Australia.

The MAL is expressed to target multinational companies that do significant work in Australia, but avoid paying tax by booking their revenue offshore. The MAL will impact multinationals which enter into schemes that have a principal purpose of avoiding tax in Australia, or reducing their foreign tax liability.

Broadly, the MAL will apply when the following occurs:

  • a foreign entity derives income from making supplies to Australian customers;
  • an entity in Australia supports the making of those supplies, and the Australian entity is an associate of or commercially dependent on the foreign entity; and
  • the income derived from the supply to Australian customers is then sent elsewhere.

Much like the ‘dominant purpose’ test in Part IVA, for the MAL to apply, it must be concluded that the scheme was entered into or carried out for ‘one or more of the principal purposes’ which are listed in the legislation. Notably, the ‘principal purposes’ test is a lower threshold than the ‘dominant purpose’ test.

Penalties of up to 120% of the amount of tax avoided

Schedule 3 of the Bill doubles the maximum administrative penalty that the Commissioner can hand down under the Administration Act.

If a significant global entity contravenes the MAL without a reasonably arguable position, the Commissioner can now impose a maximum penalty of up to 100% of the amount of tax avoided under the scheme. The penalty can be raised to 120% where aggravating factors apply.

New reporting obligations for Significant Global Entities

Significant global entities will be required to give the Commissioner three statements – a ‘Country by Country report’, a ‘master file’ and a ‘local file’. The content of the reports will assist the Commissioner in assessing transfer pricing risks and commencing audit enquiries where necessary. The reports will be filed in the country where the multinational entity has its global parent entity and will then be automatically exchanged with the tax authorities of the other countries in which the entity operates.

Conclusion

If the Bill is passed by Parliament in its current form, most of the new measures introduced will come into effect on 1 January 2016.

In their current form, the proposed laws will fortify the Commissioner’s transfer pricing, profit shifting and anti-avoidance toolkit, and will force multinationals that sell to Australian customers to re-assess their current practices, especially given the harsh penalties at stake.

We suggest you consult us as soon as possible to establish whether you could be considered a ‘significant global entity’ under the proposed laws and, if so, whether the tax structures and practices you currently have in place are compliant. For example, you may need to take action to ensure systems are in place to capture the new information required to be reported to the Commissioner.

Contact

Oliver Jankowsky

Partner & Head of International Practice

Ed Paton

Partner & Head of SE Asia Practice

Eugene Chen

Partner & Head of China Practice

Melanie Smith

Director - Business Development, Marketing and Communications

Natalie Bannister

Partner & Commercial National Practice Leader

Rhett Slocombe

Partner & Insurance National Practice Leader

Katie McKenzie

DIRECTOR - PEOPLE & CULTURE

James Bull

Special Counsel and Head of Frank

Melanie James

People & Culture Manager

Jacqui Barrett

Partner & Head of US Practice

Paul O’Donnell

Consultant & Head of Energy

Christopher Brown

Partner & Head of UK Practice

Lauren Parrant

Senior People & Culture Advisor, as at 1 July 2022

Melinda Woledge

Marketing & Communications Manager

Jasmine Koh

Senior Associate and Head of Frank

Alison Choy Flannigan

Partner & Leader, Health & Community

Billie Kerkez

Manager – Smarter Recovery Solutions

Peter Jones

Senior Commercial Counsel

You might be also interested in...

Thinking | 17 Sep 2015

Talking Tax – Issue 5

Here’s what we’ve been talking about in this week’s Hall & Wilcox Talking Tax Legislation The Income Tax Regulations 1936 have been repealed and replaced by the Income Tax Assessment (1936 Act) Regulation 2015. The new regulations have been drafted with simpler language to make them easier to read. The regulations will apply from 1 […]

Thinking | 16 Sep 2015

Thomas v Commissioner: Watch those trust blind spots!

The Federal Court’s decision in Thomas v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (Thomas) confirms that a trustee cannot allocate the fictitious tax creatures we call franking credits as it chooses. The key message of Thomas is that a franking credit is not income or an asset of a trust, even if the trust deed or trustee’s […]